Anupam Bhartiya v. Tata Capital Housing and 7 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 786/2022
(Anupam Bhartiya Vs. Tata Capital Housing)
Date: 09.11.2022
Ms. Utkarshini Singh, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present.
Ld. Counsel files Delay Condonation Application & Urgency Application with Court fee.
Ld. Counsel also files Supplementary Affidavit along with receipt of deposit of Rs. 22,000/- in Bharat Kosh towards court fee.
The appellant is Third Party. The appellant is proprietor of a firm which was dealing with respondent No. 3 for supply of raw material etc. Maximum court fee applicable in case on Third Party is Rs. 50,000/-. Ld. Counsel filed the appeal with court fee of Rs. 28,000/- and thereafter, also deposited Rs. 22,000/-. Proper court fee paid.
The instant Application has been filed under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against final order dated 06.09.2022 of DRT, Allahabad in S.A. No. 651/2022. Urgency Application (I.A. No. 565/2022) and Delay Condonation Application (I.A. No. 566/2022) have been filed.
List this case before Hon’ble Chairperson on 14.11.2022 for admission.
Registrar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090007862022
- Bench
- LD Registrar
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court