M/ S Vishal Iron and Steel Corporation and Anr. v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
In an intervening application, this court allowed the substitution of a deceased appellant's legal heirs as parties to the ongoing appeal. The matter was listed for arguments regarding limitation and waiver.
What did the court decide?
Allowance of substitution application; listing the case for arguments on limitation and waiver.
What the court decided
I.A. No. 93/2022 In Appeal Dy. No. 132/2019 Date: 07.07.2022
M/s Vishal Iron and Steel Corporation and Anr. Vs. Bank of Baroda
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellants, Shri Avinash Jaiswal, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Heard the learned counsel for the appellants on the substitution application.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant no. 2 has died, therefore, legal heirs of deceased appellant no. 2 may be arrayed as appellants in the present case. Hence, the substitution application may be allowed.
Accordingly, the substitution application filed by the appellant is allowed. Let the substitution be made in the array of party of memo of appeal by the next date.
Since the reply and rejoinder have already been filed by the parties, list this case for arguments on limitation/waiver on 28.09.2022.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Vishal Iron and Steel Corporation
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090001322019
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court