Sunil Kumar Verma and 2 Ors. v. State Bank of India and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court noted that respondents appeared on behalf of respondents 2, 3, and 4 were duly served but absent. The case was listed for reply on 05.08.2022.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 237/2019 Date: 10.05.2022
Sunil Kumar Verma & Ors. Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.
Present: Shri Prakhar Srivastava, counsel for the appellants, Miss Ashwani Pal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellants files affidavit of service along with proof of publication pursuant to the earlier order dated 28.02.2022 and submits that the respondents 2, 3 & 4 have duly been noticed. Despite service, no one is present today on behalf of the said respondents. The respondents, who are served, may put in their appearance and file reply by the next date. The respondent-Bank may also file reply by the next date.
List this case on 05.08.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sunil Kumar Verma & Ors.
- respondent
State Bank of India & Ors.
Coram
Justice R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090002372019
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court