M/s Zaz Mustang filed a regular appeal. The appellant's counsel submitted that the matter was amicably settled and sought withdrawal. The respondents did not contest this. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I.A. No. 50/2022 & I.A. No. 112/2020 In Regular Appeal No. 01/2022
Date: 10.05.2022
M/s Zaz Mustang Vs. Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Present: Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the appellant, Shri O. P. Mishra, counsel for the respondent No. 1-FI, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent-Bank, None for the other respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has amicably been settled, therefore, he wants to withdraw the appeal.
Learned counsels for the respondents do not dispute to the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant.
In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
M/s Zaz Mustang
Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd.
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
