Sunil Kumar Verma and 2 Ors. v. State Bank of India and 3 Ors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 237/2019 Date: 12.05.2023
Present: Shri Prakhar Srivastava, counsel for the appellants, Shri Avinash Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank.
Pursuant to the earlier order dated 20.02.2023, the notices were issued upon the remaining respondents. As per office report dated 11.05.2023, the notice sent to the respondent nos. 2 & 3 has returned back with endorsement “not legible”. The said report further shows that no affidavit of service has been filed by the appellant to authenticate the service of notice upon the other respondents.
Let the appellant take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the unserved respondents by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondent-bank seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 28.08.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Appellants
- respondent
The Respondent-Bank
Coram
Justice R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court