Sumit Service Station and 2 Ors. v. U C O Bank and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court adjourned the hearing of the appeal to allow the respondent-bank time to file a reply, listing it for a future date. No decision on merits was rendered.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 586/2022 Date: 19.10.2022
Sumit Service Station Vs. UCO Bank
Present: Shri Anil Kumar Singh, counsel for the appellant, Shri Yashwant Singh, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent-bank seeks time to file reply, which may be filed by the next date.
List this case on 12.01.2023 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sumit Service Station
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court