State Bank of India v. M/s Balaji Rice Mills
Case brief
What is this about?
An interim order recording the status of pleadings in an appeal. The Court directed the appellant to file a rejoinder and warned respondent no. 3 to file a reply under the penalty of default. The case was listed for filing on 28.09.2022.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 305/2020 Date: 07.07.2022
State Bank of India Vs. M/s Balaji Rice Mills & Ors.
Present: Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the respondent-Borrower, None for the other respondents,
The record shows that reply on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 & 2 has been filed, to which rejoinder has not been filed by the counsel for the appellant. Let the same be filed by the next date. The record also reveals that no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 3. Last opportunity is granted to the respondent no. 3 for filing reply by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case on 28.09.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
M/s Balaji Rice Mills
Coram
Justice R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 091090003052020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court