State Bank of India v. M/s Balaji Rice Mills
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular Appeal listed for hearing on 10.11.2022. Reply filed by respondent No. 3 was closed due to non-filing within the stipulated timeframe. No rejoinder filed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 305/2020 Date: 28.09.2022
State Bank of India Vs. M/s Balaji rice Mills
Present: Shri Dhananjay Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Shri S.K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 2, Shri Abhishek Mishra, counsel for the respondent No. 3,
Inspite of earlier order dated 07.07.2022 of this Tribunal, no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent No. 3 despite last opportunity being granted. Hence, right of respondent No. 3 to file reply is hereby closed. The office report dated 27.09.2022 shows that no rejoinder has been filed to the reply of respondents No. 1 and 2, which may be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case for hearing on 10.11.2022.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
M/s Balaji rice Mills
Coram
Justice R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 091090003052020
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court