M/s Shri Sai Geetanjali Honda v. Canara Bank And 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order directing appellant counsel to serve notices on un-served respondent counsel with the application within 48 hours and fix next hearing date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I.A. No. 55/2022 & I.A. No. 184/2021 In Appeal Dy. No. 382/2020
Date: 22.04.2022
M/s Shri Sai Geetanjali Honda Vs. Canara Bank and Ors.
Present: Shri Rishi Upadhyay, counsel for the appellant, Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondents No. 1 & 2- Bank,
Shri Saurabh Suman along with Shri Baua Jha, counsels for the respondents no. 3 & 4-Auction Purchasers,
Learned counsels for the respondents state that they have not been served with the copies of I.A. No. 55/2022 and 184/2021.
Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to serve the same upon the learned counsels for the respondents within 48 hours, who may file response by the next date.
List this case on 10.08.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Shri Sai Geetanjali Honda
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 091090003822020
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court