Adjournment order granting the appellant's counsel one more date for hearing the regular appeal due to previous counsel's elevation to the bench.
Case listed for hearing on 11.08.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 164/2018 Date: 22.04.2022
Pawan Kumar Baranwal Vs. Central Bank of India & Ors.
Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate today files vakalatnama on behalf of the appellant stating that earlier counsel Shri V. D. Chauhan has been elevated as judge of the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court. The vakalatnama filed by Shri Shukla is taken on record.
Shri Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Advocate holding brief of Shri Himanshu Tiwari, counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that Shri Tiwari is out of station, therefore, he seeks adjournment.
As prayed, list this case on 11.08.2022 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Pawan Kumar Baranwal
Central Bank of India
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
