Canara Bank v. Arvinder Singh and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The bench directed the respondent no. 2 to file a reply and the respondents no. 1 & 3 to file a rejoinder by the next date, then listed the case for the reply on 12.08.2022.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 233/2019 Date: 22.04.2022
Canara Bank Vs. Arvinder Singh & Ors.
Present: Shri Sandeep Arora, Advocate holding brief of Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the appellant, Shri V. K. Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri S. K. Pandey, counsel for the respondent no. 1, 2 & 3,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that no rejoinder to the reply of the respondent nos. 1 & 3 has been filed and no reply has been filed by the respondent no. 2 despite time being granted. Let the respondent no. 2 file reply by the next date and rejoinder to the reply of the respondents no. 1 & 3 be also filed by the next date, if so desired.
List this case on 12.08.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Arvinder Singh
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court