M/s Shri Sai Geetanjali Honda v. Canara Bank And 3 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 382/2020 Date: 22.02.2023
M/s Shri Sai Geetanjali Honda Vs. Canara Bank and Ors.
Present: Shri Abhishek Agarwal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Satyajeet Mukherji, counsel for the appellant, Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondents No. 1 & 2- Bank,
None for the respondents no. 3 & 4-Auction Purchasers,
As per office report dated 21.02.2023, no reply has been filed by the respondents to the stay and delay condonation applications and reply to the memo of appeal has been filed by the respondent nos. 3 & 4, to which no rejoinder has been filed by the appellant. Let the reply by the respondent nos. 1 & 2 and rejoinder by the appellant to the reply of the respondent nos. 3 & 4 be filed by the next date.
List this case on 11.05.2023 for reply. Till then the interim order, if any, shall remain operative.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Shri Sai Geetanjali Honda
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 091090003822020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court