Rudra Bhattacharya and Anr. v. Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar directed the appellant to correct procedural defects and file missing documents within 15 days. The application challenged an impugned order of the DRT.
What did the court decide?
The applicant was directed to remove defects within 15 days of receipt of the order.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.448/2021 Date: 22 / 03 /2022
Sri Rudra Bhattacharya & Anr...………...Appellants
Vs.
The A.O. Bank of India & Ors. ……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18(1) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Mr. Rudra Bhattacharya (party in person) .
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on Mr. Rudra Bhattacharya (party in person) against the order passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-3, Kolkata. Application fees of Rs.200/vide T.R. no.115180 dt.12-08-2021 has been paid along with the application.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
Application is not within the period of Limitation but accompanied with a petition for condonation of delay.
Waiver petition is filed.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow a defect-ridden application under S. 18(1) SARFAESI Act without substantive rulings.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rudra Bhattacharya
- respondent
Bank of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 191090004482021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court