Sri Tapas Kumar Roy v. Indian Overseas Bank and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar noted procedural defects in an appeal under S. 18 of SRAESA, 2002, directed removal of defects within 15 days, and postponed the matter due to the absence of the appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal no.319/2018 Date: 22/03/2022
Tapas Kumar Roy………...Appellant
Vs.
Indian Overseas Bank & anr ……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Diptabratra Batabyal.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Tapas Kumar Roy against the order dt. 17.04.2018 in SA/62/2018 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT -1, Kolkata. Application fees of Rs.250/- vide T.R. no.112597 dt. 10.08.2018 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Diptabratra Batabyal.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not within the period of Limitation but accompanied with a petition for condonation of delay.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tapas Kumar Roy
- respondent
Indian Overseas Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court