Adjudicating officer noted that service of summons was confirmed for most respondents but incomplete for three respondents. This matter was posted adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.90/2020; Date:08/03/2022
United Bank of India (now Punjab National Bank)……….Appellant
Vs.
Sri Ashok Kr. Kanungo & ors ……….Respondents
Ld. Counsel, Ms. Sharmistha Pal is present on behalf of appellant. Affidavit for service of summons is filed on today. Postal tracking reports are showing that service of summons is confirmed upon respondent no.1, 4 to 5(g) & 6 whereas it is not completed upon respondent no.2, 3 & 5(h). She shall try for another service upon respondent no.2, 3 & 5(h).
None present for respondents .
Post this matter on 29.04.2022.
Sd/-
REGISTRAR
United Bank of India (now Punjab National Bank)
Sri Ashok Kr. Kanungo & ors
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
