Thanneru Nagaraju v. Union Bank Of India erstwhile Andhra Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal no.02/2022 Date:07/03/2022
Thanneru Nagaraju ……….Appellant
Vs.
Union Bank of India & ors ……….Respondents
Ld. Counsel, Ms. Supriti Mandal is present on behalf of appellant. Affidavit for service of summons is filed on today. Postal tracking reports are showing that service of summons is confirmed upon respondent no.1,2,3 & 4 while it is not confirmed for respondent no.5 & 6.
Ld. Counsel, Mr. Nemani Srinivas files vakalatnama for respondent no.2,3,5 & 6.
However, Ld. Counsel, Mr. Srinivas is representing for respondent no.5 & 6.
None appears for other respondents.
Post this matter on 04.05.2022.
Sd/-
REGISTRAR
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Thanneru Nagaraju
- respondent
Union Bank of India & ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court