Punjab National Bank v. Sri Prabhat Kumar Banerjee And Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.83/2020 Date:08/03/2022
United Bank of India (now Punjab National Bank) ……….Appellant
Vs.
Sri Prabhat Kumar Banerjee & ors ……….Respondents
Ld. Counsel, Ms. Sharmistha Pal is present on behalf of appellant. Affidavit for service of summons is filed on today. Postal tracking reports are showing that service of summons is confirmed upon respondents except respondent no. 5©, (e) & (g).
Remarks made in tracking report as ‘item returned refused’ in respect of respondent no. 5(a) & 5(d) are treated as effective service while the remark made as ‘unclaimed’ in respect of respondent no. 5 (c), (e) & (g) are treated as service not effective.
None present for respondents .
Ld. Counsel for appellant shall try for another attempt of service upon respondents,
whom could not be served.
Post this matter on 29.04.2022.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
United Bank of India (now Punjab National Bank)
- respondent
Sri Prabhat Kumar Banerjee & ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court