This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 59 of 2018)
(Arising out of Appeal No. 2 of 2017 in DRT-2, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
14.03.2022 Allahabad Bank
… Appellant Vs.
Pijush Kanti Das & Another …Respondents
Mr. Ajit Kumar Mondal, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. Nimish Mishra with Mr. Debjit Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2
Mr. J. Basu Ray, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 3/Auction Purchaser
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Record shows that an order was passed on the 12th of July, 2018 directing the Appellant to implead the then Allahabad Bank, now Indian Bank, as Respondent No. 3. The said order has not been complied with by the Appellant.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks a week’s time for compliance.
As per the order dated 12th July, 2018, Learned Counsel for Auction Purchaser/Respondent No. 3 had submitted that copy of Memo of Appeal has already been
2
received by the Auction Purchaser; hence copy need not be served upon Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 3/Auction Purchaser.
Respondent No. 3 shall be at liberty to file affidavit, if any, by the next date of hearing; advance copy whereof be served upon the Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2 and the Appellant.
List the matter on 17th May, 2022 for hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 14th March, 2022 03/ac
Allahabad Bank
Pijush Kanti Das
Another
Auction Purchaser
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court