Indian Bank v. Shri Pijush Kanti Das and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The tribunal listed the appeal for hearing on a future date after granting adjournments on personal grounds to all parties. No decision was rendered.
The tribunal listed the appeal for hearing on a future date after granting adjournments on personal grounds to all parties. No decision was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 59 of 2018
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
12.10.2023
Indian Bank ... Appellants -Vs……Respondents Mr. Partha Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Debjit Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 & 2 Mr. J. Basu Roy, Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Adjournment is sought by the Learned Counsel for the Appellant as well as the Respondents on the personal ground.
List on 16th January, 2024 for hearing of Appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 12th October, 2023 24/tp
Indian Bank
Mr. Partha Mukherjee
Mr. Debjit Mukherjee
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court