The High Court Registrar adjourned Regular Appeal No. 59/2017 because the appellant's counsel was out of station. The court warned the appellant that the matter is repeatedly adjourned and will be heard on the fixed date.
Case adjourned to 01.12.2022; warning issued for repeated adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 59/2017 Date: 21.09.2022
M/s D. V. Poultry Farm & Anr. Vs. Union Bank of India
Present: Shri Atma Prakash, Advocate holding brief of Shri G. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, Shri S. D. Sahai, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri G. K. Srivastava is out of station, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
Learned counsel for the respondent-bank submits that the present appeal has become infructuous and the matter is repeatedly adjourned on behalf of the appellant.
As prayed, the case is adjourned to 01.12.2022. It is made clear that the matter will be heard on the date fixed.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
M/s D. V. Poultry Farm & Anr.
Union Bank of India
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
