Punjab National Bank v. Smt Sikha Bishal
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata received an appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act for deficiency in service. The Tribunal noted that the application was filed beyond the limitation period and suffered a deficit in fees. The matter was post-poned for removal of defects within 15 days.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.433/2019; Dt.30.03.2022
United Bank of India.………...Appellant
Vs.
Sujit Kumar Bishal & ors.……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Pralay Kar.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of United Bank of India against the order dt.27.08.2019 in SA/692/2010 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Kolkata. Application fees of Rs.250/- vide T.R. no.114263 dt. 23.12.2019 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Pralay Kar.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not within the period of Limitation but condonation for delay petition
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act can be admitted when filed beyond the limitation period with a prayer for condonation of delay.
Whether a deficit application fee of Rs. 25,125/- has been paid along with the prescribed fee of Rs. 250/-.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
United Bank of India
- respondent
Sujit Kumar Bishal & ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court