Patibandla Harshini v. Bank Of Baroda and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. no.217/2019; 29/03/2022
Patibandla Harshini.………...Appellant
Vs.
A.O., Vijaya Bank (now Bank of Baroda) & ors……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Malay Bhattacharjee.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Patibandla Harshini against the order dt. 04.01.2019 in SA/629/2014 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-1, Hyderabad. Application fees of Rs.50405/- vide T.R. no.113817 dt. 05.09.2019 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Malay Bhattacharjee.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not within the period of Limitation but accompanied with petition for condonation of delay.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Patibandla Harshini
- respondent
A.O., Vijaya Bank (now Bank of Baroda)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court