The tribunal dismissed the filed application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act in default due to non-compliance of an earlier order. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as time barred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. 433 of 2019
(Arising out of S.A. No. 692 of 2010 in DRT -2, Kolkata) THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.09.2023
Punjab National Bank ... Appellants -VsSujit Kumar Bishal and ors ……Respondents None for the Appellant Mr. P. Pal, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list. None is present for the Appellant. Compliance of order dated 2nd August 2023 is also not made. Accordingly, Application under Section 5 of Limitation Act is dismissed in default. Consequently, Appeal is also dismissed as time barred.
Pending I.A.s if any, are disposed of accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to the Appellant and the Respondent and the copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record Room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court today.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 22nd September, 2023 3/tp
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal remains maintainable after the default in compliance with a previous order.
Punjab National Bank
Sujit Kumar Bishal
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
