This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 48/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 344/2018 (DRT-III, Delhi)
Sh. Mulakhraj Dua Vs Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda
20.10.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Hashmat Nabi, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Amit Mahaliyan, Ld. Counsel for respondents no.1 and 2.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Notice issued on the I.A. No. 562/2022 and I.A. No. 668/2022 to the respondents/appellant by all permissible modes for 17.11.2022 date already fixed. Mr. Hashmat Nabi, Ld. Counsel appears for appellant has accepted the notice.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
1 issue framed by the court
The filing of notice via video conferencing has been accepted by the appellant's counsel
Mulakhraj Dua
Bank of Baroda
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
