Mulkraj Dua v. Bank of Baroda
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 48/2022
Arising out of S.A.No. 344/2018 (DRT-III, Delhi)
Sh. Mulakhraj Dua Vs
Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda & Ors.
18.08.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Hashmat Nabi, Ld. Counsel for appellant
Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Amit Mahailyan, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 bank
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Ld. Counsel for respondents 3 to 8
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
The learned senior counsel for respondent no.1 bank states that he wants to move an application for transposition of respondent no.1 as appellant no.2.
List on 01.09.2022. Let the application be moved in the meanwhile.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mulakhraj Dua
- respondent
Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda
Coram
Brijesh Sethi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court