Mulkraj Dua v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
Justice Brijesh Sethi adjourned Appeal No. 48/2022 before the DRAT due to time constraints and scheduled further proceedings for 17.11.2022.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Appeal No. 48/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 344/2018 (DRT-III, Delhi)
Sh. MulakrajDua Vs Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda
01.09.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice BrijeshSethi
Present: Mr. HashmatNabi, Ld. counsel for appellant
Mr. RakeshTiku, Ld. Sr. Advocate along with Mr.AmitMahaliyan, Ld. counsel for respondent
Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Ld. counsel for respondent no.3
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
It is now 4.15 p.m. No time left to hear the matter today, as much time was consumed in hearing arguments and dictating orders in some other matters.
List the matter for 17.11. 2022 for further proceedings.
(CHAIRPERSON)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sh. Mulakraj Dua
- respondent
Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Respondent no.3
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court