Smt Ponnoru Bharathi And others v. Canara Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 42 of 2022 arising out of SA No. 184 of 2017 in DRT Visakhapatnam) THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
23.09.2022
Smt. Ponnuru Bharathi & ors … Appellant -VsThe A.O. Canara Bank (erstwhile Syndicate Bank) ….Respondents
Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Aparajita Rao, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel Ms. Aparajita Rao has put her appearance for the Respondent No. 1 who undertakes to file the power within two days. Learned Counsel for the Appellant is directed to provide the copy of Paper Book to the Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 6 is served while other Respondents are also not served. Fresh notices be issued to Respondent No. 2 to 5, 7 and 8. Fresh Affidavit of service be filed. Opposition be filed within four weeks with copy to Appellant.
List on 18th January, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether fresh notices are to be issued to unserved respondents and opposition filed within four weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Ponnuru Bharathi & ors
- respondent
The A.O. Canara Bank (erstwhile Syndicate Bank)
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court