An appeal was dismissed in default before the DRT-Appeal Tribunal in Kolkata as the appellant did not appear to represent themselves. Pending applications were closed and interim orders vacated.
Appeal dismissed in default; pending I.A.s closed; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 204 of 2018)
(Arising out of O.A. 48 of 2006 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
23.09.2022 Dr. Tasneed Fatima Khatoon … Appellant -vsState Bank of Hyderabad & 4 Others … Respondents
None for Appellant
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the second round.
None appears to represent the Appellant.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Appeal No. 204 of 2022,
stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 23rd September, 2022 17/ac
Dr. Tasneed Fatima Khatoon
State Bank of Hyderabad
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
