Kalyan Educational Society v. Punjb National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
In independent application I.A. 441 of 2019 seeking condonation of delay, the court noted appellants' deposit was not verified in the application. Counsel was granted one week to file a supplementary affidavit, with responses invited thereafter.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
I.A. 23 of 2020 And I.A. 441 of 2019 And I.A. 442 of 2019 In
(Appeal No. 318 of 2018)
(Arising out of O.A. 342 of 2016 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
19.04.2022 Kalyan Educational Society & 3 Others … Appellants -vs-
Punjab National Bank & Another … Respondents
Mr. A.K. Dhandhania with Mr. Soham Bandopadhyay and Mr. Aditya Chaturvedi, Learned Counsel for Appellants
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1/Punjab National Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 23 of 2020, is a put up application. The matter being taken up, the I.A. 23 of 2020 stands disposed of.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether cause of condonation of delay for preferring appeal is made out where deposit is pending despite interim compliance.
Whether one week's time to file supplementary affidavit to verify deposit details is admissible.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kalyan Educational Society
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court