An interlocutory order extending time for the appellant to file a rejoinder to the reply of the respondent before the National Company Law Tribunal.
Time granted to file rejoinder by the next date; otherwise appropriate order to be passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 257/2018 Date: 23.05.2023
Present: Shri Bablu, Advocate holding brief of Shri B. K. Kesharwani, counsel for the appellant, Shri Krishna Shankar, counsel for the respondent no.1, Shri N. K. Dwivedi, Advocate holding brief of Shri P. K. Pandey, counsel for the respondent no. 2-Auction Purchaser,
Learned counsel for the appellant further seeks time to file rejoinder to the reply of the respondent no. 1. Let the same be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed as the appeal is of year 2018.
List this case on 06.09.2023 for rejoinder.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Shri B. K. Kesharwani
Respondent no.1
Respondent no. 2
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
