Nitin Chnadra Srivasta And Anr. v. Bank of India and 3 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 245/2017 Date: 24.02.2022
Nitin Chandra Srivastava Vs. Bank of India
Present: Shri Santosh Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to file rejoinder to the reply filed by the respondent no. 1. Let the same be filed by the next date.
The office report shows that no reply has been filed by the respondent no. 2, who was represented through an Advocate prior to dismissal of the appeal. Since no notice has been served either on filing of the restoration application or after restoration of the appeal, therefore, the notice be issued to the respondentAuction Purchaser by two modes i.e. Registered Post with A.D. and Speed Post. Steps to be taken by the appellant within 15 days.
List this case on 09.05.2022 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nitin Chandra Srivastava
- respondent
Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court