This order grants an extension for filing a vakalatnama and adjourns the matter to a reply date due to the advisor's elevation to a judgeship.
Vacatnama filed by next date; case listed on 12.04.2022 for reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 220/2019 Date: 24.02.2022
S.N.G. Developers Ltd. Vs. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. and Ors.
Present: None for the respondents,
Perusal of the order dated 11.11.2021 shows that the learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 was given time to file reply, which has not been done till date. Let the same be filed by the next date.
Shri Anirudh Pandey, Advocate appears on behalf of the appellant and submits that the learned counsel for the appellant Shri V. D. Chauhan, as he was then, has been elevated as Judge of the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, therefore, he seeks time to file vakalatnama on behalf of the appellant, which is granted.
List this case on 12.04.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
S.N.G. Developers Ltd.
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
