High Court Tribunal dismissed an appeal filed by State Bank of India in default due to the appellant's non-appearance. All pending applications and interim orders were also dismissed as infructuous.
The appeal was dismissed in default; pending I.A.s were dismissed as infructuous; interim orders were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 237 of 2017)
(Arising out of T.S.A. 12 of 2015 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
29.04.2022 State Bank of India … Appellant -vsMeena Fashion & Others … Respondents
None for Appellant
None for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up on the revised call. None is present for the Appellant.
The appeal, being Appeal No. 237 of 2017, is dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stands dismissed, being infructuous.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Record be consigned to record room.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 29th April, 2022
01/ac
State Bank of India
Meena Fashion & Others
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
