Uco Bank v. Kakali Sarkar and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 141 of 2018) (Arising out of S.A. 363 of 2015 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
28.04.2022 UCO Bank … Appellants -vsKakali Sarkar & 3 Others … Respondents Mr. Arjun Mukherjee with Mr. S.N. Patra Bhatta and Ms. Sucharita Sil, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Ms. Sweta Mishra, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1
Mr. Nemani Srinivas with Mr. Rohit Bhattacharjee, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2
None for Respondents No. 3 & 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Mr. Arup Paul, who was Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1, Smt. Kakali Sarkar, expired during pendency of this appeal. It is informed that Smt. Kakali Sarkar is not living at her given address. In this circumstance, it would be appropriate that notice by registered post be sent at the given address; simultaneously, notice be also published in two widely circulated local daily newspapers; one in English and the other in vernacular, and file affidavit-of-service on the next date.
List the matter on 22nd July, 2022 for hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
UCO Bank
- respondent
Kakali Sarkar
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court