Boppa Praveen v. Corporation Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act due to default by the appellant. Consequently, the pending appeal (Diary No. 426 of 2019) was declared time-barred and dismissed. All pending applications and interim orders were also disposed of.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as time-barred; the application for condonation of delay was dismissed in default.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 426 of 2019)
(Arising out of O.A. 424 of 2011 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
29.04.2022 Boppa Praveen … Appellant -vsCorporation Bank … Respondent
None for Appellant
None for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up on the revised call. None is present for the parties.
An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, has been filed for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. Since none is present to press the application, the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is dismissed in default.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Diary No. 426 of 2019, stands dismissed as time barred.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning delay should be allowed in default proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Boppa Praveen
- respondent
Corporation Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090004262019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court