Appeal No. 14 of 2022 arising from O.A. 485 of 2020 in DRT, Cuttack, was dismissed in default before the Deばts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata as the appellant appeared. Pending interim orders and applications were also dismissed as infructuous.
Appeal dismissed in default; pending I.A.s dismissed as infructuous; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 14 of 2022)
(Arising out of O.A. 485 of 2020 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
28.04.2022 Soumya Ranjan Swain … Appellant -vsBank of Baroda … Respondent
None for Appellant
Mr. Dipanjan Dutta, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the second round.
None appears to represent the Appellant.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Appeal No. 14 of 2022, (Diary No. 234 of 2021) stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stands dismissed, being infructuous.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Record be consigned to record room.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 28th April, 2022 06/ac
Soumya Ranjan Swain
Bank of Baroda
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
