Regular Appeal No. 231/2015 dismissed a fresh appeal but remanded the matter to the Tribunal below for reconsidering the appellant's recall application as per law.
Matter remanded to the Tribunal below for reconsidering the recall application filed by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 231/2015 Date: 18.10.2022
Baijnath Prasad Mehta and Baijnath Prasad Mahto and Baijnath Mahto Vs. Corporation Bank
Present: Shri Abhay Kumar Singh, counsel for the appellant, Shri S. D. Sahai, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Heard the learned counsels for the parties.
Learned counsel for the appellant is limiting his prayer to the extent that the matter may be remanded back to the Tribunal below for reconsidering the recall application a fresh as per law and no other prayer is being pressed.
Learned counsel for the respondent-bank has no objection to the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant.
In view of the above, the appeal is disposed off and the matter is remanded back to the Tribunal below for reconsidering the recall application filed by the appellant in accordance with law most expeditiously.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Baijnath Prasad Mehta
Baijnath Prasad Mahto
Baijnath Mahto
Corporation Bank
R. D. Khare
V N Giri
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
