The court issued an order in a regular appeal concerning leave to appeal. It addressed a submission regarding non-service of the application, granted leave for service that day, noted the applicant's undertaking, and listed the matter for reply by a specific date. No substantive legal proposition is established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 207/2017 Date: 12.05.2022
Kamlesh Kumar Kesharwani & Anr. Vs. Central Bank of India & Ors.
Present: Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellants, Shri Manoj Kumar Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-CBI, Shri M. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Allahabad Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent-CBI submits that the application for leave to appeal has not been served upon him. Learned counsel for the applicant undertakes to serve the same during course of the day. Let the same be done. In case the respondent-Bank chooses to file reply, the same be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case on 01.08.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Kamlesh Kumar Kesharwani & Anr.
Central Bank of India & Ors.
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
