Kamlesh Kumar Kesharwani and Anr. v. Central Bank of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular Appeal No. 207/2017. The court listed the matter on 22.03.2023 while noting the respondent-CBI filed a reply to a leave application and the appellant argued objections should have been raised earlier.
What the court decided
Regular Appeal No. 207/2017 Date: 30.01.2023
Kamlesh Kumar Kesharwani and Anr. Vs. Central Bank of India and Ors.
Present: Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri Manoj Kumar Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-CBI, Ex-parte against the respondents no. 2 to 6, Shri M. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent no. 7- Allahabad Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondent-CBI has filed reply to leave application filed by the appellant.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that if such objections were to be made, it should have been made at very initial stage and now such application is only misconceived and the same has not deliberately been filed. If the respondent-Bank chooses to file reply to the appeal, they may to do so by the next date.
List this case on 22.03.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kamlesh Kumar Kesharwani and Anr.
- respondent
Central Bank of India
- respondent
Allahabad Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court