M.A. No. 23/2021 in Regular Appeal No. 02/2020. The court listed the case for restoration and directed service of the restoration application on the respondent's counsel with a deadline to file a response.
Listed for restoration; served application to respondent's counsel to file response by next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 23/2021 In Regular Appeal No. 02/2020 Date: 04.08.2022
Kavita Srivastava Vs. Union Bank of India
Present: Shri Amit Khanna, counsel for the appellant, Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the restoration application is pending consideration.
Learned counsel for the respondent-bank submits that copy of restoration application has not been served upon him.
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that copy of restoration application shall be served upon the counsel for the respondent-Bank during course of the day, who may file response to the said application by the next date.
List this case on 01.11.2022 for restoration.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Kavita Srivastava
Union Bank of India
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
