Disposed
Kavita Srivastava v. Union Bank of India
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/2/2020
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 23/2021 In Regular Appeal No. 02/2020 Date: 19.01.2023
Kavita Srivastava Vs. Union Bank of India
Present: Shri A. K. Bansal along with Shri Amit Khanna, counsel for the appellant, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
The office report dated 18.01.2023 shows that no reply has been filed by the respondent-Bank to the restoration application. Let the same be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
List this case on 24.02.2023 for restoration.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Kavita Srivastava
Union Bank of India
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court