Kamalkishore Onkarmal Rungta v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal and applications were dismissed for default, as the appellant failed to appear despite a specific direction to do so.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 81/2019
Between
Mr. Kamalkishore Onkarmal Rungta & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Union Bank of India …Respondent/s
-: Order dated : 22/06/2022 :-
Neither the Appellants nor the Respondent has been appearing in the matter for some time.
There was a specific direction given to the parties to appear and proceed with the matter. The application for waiver of deposit is also under consideration.
I assume that the Appellants are not keen on proceeding with the Appeal and hence Appeal and applications are dismissed for default.
All other Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-6
1
Mr. Kamalkishore Onkarmal Rungta & Ors.
Union Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court