Mrs Sumita Chowdhury v. United Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 170 of 2018)
(Arising out of R.A. 03 of 2018 in DRT-2, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
04.05.2022 Mrs. Sumita Chowdhury … Appellants -vsPunjab National Bank & Another … Respondents Mr. Samik Basu, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 Bank
None for Respondent No. 2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Rejoinder filed by Appellant is taken on record.
When enquired about appearance of Respondent No. 2, it is submitted that even before Learned DRT Respondent No. 2 did not appear, hence his presence is not required.
List the matter on 232rd June, 2022 for hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mrs. Sumita Chowdhury
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court