The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for hearing on 20 July 2022 after receiving the opposition filed by the auction purchaser and directed counsel to file a rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No.109 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. 123 of 2018 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
27.04.2022 Utkal Grameen Bank … Appellant -vsSatyabrata Panda & 2 Others … Respondents
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for Appellant Bank
None for other Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit-of-service reveals Respondents No. 1, 2 and 3 have been served. Respondent No. 2/Auction Purchaser has filed opposition; copy whereof has been received today in Court by Learned Counsel for the Appellant Bank by putting his signature on the copy of the opposition.
Rejoinder, if any, be filed in the meantime.
List the matter on 20th July, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 27th April, 2022 05/ac
Utkal Grameen Bank
Satyabrata Panda
2 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
