Utkal Grameen Bank v. Satyabrata Panda
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 109 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. No. 123 of 2018 in DRT -Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
| 23.03.2023 | The Regional Manager cum Authorised officer Utkal Grameen Bank & ors. … Appellant |
|---|---|
| -Vs- Satyabrata Panda and ors ….Respondents |
|
| Mr. S. Pal Chowdhury, Learned Counsel along with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for the Appellant |
|
| Mr. Tekeswar Mohanti, party in | |
| person |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Husband of Respondent No. 2 is present in person and sought time to engage some lawyer to contest the matter. I.A. No. 61 of 2023 an application under Section 19(25) and 22 of the Act, 1993 read with Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed by the Appellant. Objection if any, be filed within two weeks.
List on 10th July, 2023 for hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Regional Manager cum Authorised officer Utkal Grameen Bank & ors.
- respondent
Satyabrata Panda and ors
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court