Utkal Grameen Bank v. Satyabrata Panda
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a listing order in an appeal by Utkal Grameen Bank. The bench directed notice to be sent to the Auction Purchaser respondent who appeared personally without notice. The case was listed for the next date of hearing to be served.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No.109 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. 123 of 2018 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
20.072022 Utkal Grameen Bank … Appellant -vsSatyabrata Panda & 2 Others … Respondents Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for Appellant Bank
None for other Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It appears that Respondent No. 2, Smt. Prabhati Mahanta, who is the Auction Purchaser, has filed her opposition in person. No notice of today’s hearing has been given to her.
Let notice upon Respondent No. 2, Smt. Prabhati Mahanta, be sent intimating the next date of hearing and file Affidavit-of-service before the next date of listing.
List on 14th September, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Utkal Grameen Bank
- respondent
Satyabrata Panda
- respondent
Prabhati Mahanta
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court