Bank of Baroda v. The Icici Bank Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order in Appeal No. 106/2008 directing the respondent to file a reply within three weeks no further time granted matter posted for hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 106/2008
Between
Bank of Baroda
… Appellant/s
V/s.
ICICI Bank Ltd. & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr Nilesh Bamne, i/b M/s. A.R. Bamne & Co., Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr V Mannadiar, i/b M/s. Mannadiar & Co., Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.
Reply has not been filed within three weeks as directed. The Ld Counsel for the Respondent submits that further time is required in view of the compilation that is filed by the Appellant.
The reply shall be filed positively, within three weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court