Smt Punita Mathur v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
List order for appointment of list date; record of receipt of court fee and waiver application in SARFAESI Act appeal against DRT order regarding sale of property.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 606/2022
(Smt. Punita Mathur Vs. Bank of Baroda)
Date: 03.11.2022
Shri Amit Sonkar, holding brief of Shri Prashant Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present and submits receipt of online payment of Rs. 1500/- in Bharat Kosh towards Court fee. Dates and Events has also been filed.
No pre deposit has been made. Waiver Application has been filed. The appellant is neither the borrower nor the guarantor of the respondent-bank. The respondent-bank sold the property of the appellant. it is observed that Sale Notice of the respondent-Bank does not bear the name of appellant. (Page 38 of the instant appeal). Ld. Counsel states that he will argue before the Hon’ble Court.
The instant Application has been filed under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against final order dated 28.07.2022 of DRT, Dehradun in MA. No. 40/2021. Delay Condonation Application (I.A. No. 331/2022), Waiver Application (I.A. No. 330/2022) have been filed.
List this case before Hon’ble Chairperson on 11 .11.2022 for admission.
Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Punita Mathur
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090006062022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court