State Bank of India v. United Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This miscellaneous application addressed service defects. The court directed counsel to serve the respondent via hand or post instead of email, citing missing verification records.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc Application No. /11/2020 Date : 02/12/2022 (Arising out of Appeal No. 53 of 2014)
State Bank of India ….. Appliacant Vs United Bank of India &Anr. ------ Respondents
Ld. Counsel Mr. PijushKanti Ray is present on behalf of Miscellaneous Applicant and files affidavit of service which was served upon Ld. Counsel of Respondent No. 1 by e-mail. He submits that Respondent No. 2 was not appearing in main appeal since inception despite of newspaper publication, so the restoration application was not served upon said Respondent.
Ase-mail of Ld. Counsel of Respondent No. 1 is not available on record it could not be verified.
Hence, Ld. Counsel for Applicant is directed for effective service upon Respondent No.1, by hand or post.
Post the matter on 15/12/2022 for filing affidavit of service.
Sd/-
REGISTRAR
Parties & counsel
- applicant
State Bank of India
- respondent
United Bank of India
- respondent
Anr.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court