State Bank of India v. United Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal ordered the applicant bank to serve the restoration application on Respondent No. 1 and effect service on Respondent No. 2 via publication within three weeks, fixing a list date for disposal while imposing costs.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc Application No. 11 of 2020
In Appeal No. 53 of 2014
(Arising out of S.A. 1375 of 2013 of DRT-II, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
28.03.2023 State Bank of India … Applicant -VsUnited Bank of India & Another … Respondents
Mr. Pijush Kanti Ray with Mr. S. Bandopadhyay, Learned Counsel for Applicant
Mr. Nemai Kumar Rakshit, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1/Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Heard the Learned Counsel for the Applicant as well as Respondent No. 1.
At the very outset, it would be pertinent to mention that the appeal was dismissed in default on 13th February, 2020. Thereafter restoration application was filed on 13th March, 2020 which is within time. But subsequent thereto, Applicant has not taken appropriate steps.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant must serve notice onRespondent No. 2 included in a defaulted appeal.
Whether the restoration application should be dismissed for default.
Remaining list date for disposal of the restoration application.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
State Bank of India
- respondent
United Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court